We provide expertise in the field of wiki editing, concerning both the technical aspects of using the wiki code and the research necessary for developing the texts. The members of our team gathered their experience as Wikipedia users and, given the current on-line context, most of our wiki-related work takes place on Wikipedia itself. Because of this website's prevalence, we find necessary to detail about how we work there.

An important issue raised by the manner Wikipedia works is that many subjects that would be entitled to be covered there are absent or poorly presented. Wikipedia is created by voluntary work, hence it depends on the voluntary users whether and when a certain subject would be covered. The context is complicated by the increasing amount of knowledge necessary for editing and for understanding the "Wikipedia common sense", thus impeding the outsiders' attempts to write there without a previous training.

Given the status of this online encyclopedia, as expected, subjects not yet covered consider themselves disadvantaged, unfairly treated. The expected outcome, hiring users to cover absent topics, generated an amount of debate among Wikipedia community. Currently, Wikipedia does not have a clear regulation on paid contributions of content, the issue being discussed with pro and con arguments.

The main argument of those opposing paid editing is that the respective user could not maintain a neutral point of view. An argument rebuffed by those who support it by the fact that the very impulse to spend time editing there is a certain interest in certain subjects. We would add here that, as we could see from our experience, the desired neutral point of view is not something preexisting, but obtained and discovered through discussions between the users engaged in editing a certain area, working to reach a consensus about the correct rendering of an article. The broad experience earned through participation in such debates would be what we call the "Wikipedia common sense". It is not possible to have free road in pursuing a certain point of view, since each user is under the watchful eye of the other users and nobody owns anything there, there is no private property in Wikipedia world. We consider that the idea of somebody embodying or owning a certain human neutral point of view could be applied only in certain religious contexts.

What can we do. We are a team of expert Wikipedia users with strong experience in writing Wikipedia articles. We would be glad to hear from you about writing/improving Wikipedia articles. Upon notification, if the respective topic is not covered at all there, we will assess whether it would pass the notability threshold of Wikipedia. If it does not pass, we will tell you about what is missing and is expected there (hopefully in the future you will be our clients). If it passes or if it already exists there in a poor state, we will present you a plan and we will assess a reasonable sum of money for our work on writing about the respective topic (we will expect an upfront). We will explain you about the choices we consider in rendering the text. In order to be efficient, the paid editing on Wikipedia supposes a long-term foresight. Each article is under the scrutiny of the entire community, determining the subsequent self-regulating process towards a balanced presentation, including all the legitimate points of view about the respective topic.